Actual MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I Exam Prep Materials is The Best Choice for You

Blog Article

Tags: MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I Dumps Cost, Latest MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I Dumps Sheet, MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I Valid Study Materials, MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I Official Study Guide, MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I Valid Test Papers

DOWNLOAD the newest Prep4SureReview MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I PDF dumps from Cloud Storage for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=16cJQh7ozsgiKUngaCBLvLksf-IVmT_Jh

Prep4SureReview believes in customer satisfaction and strives hard to make the entire Salesforce MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I exam preparation process simple, smart, and successful. To achieve this objective the Prep4SureReview is offering the top-rated and real MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I exam questions in three different MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I Exam study material formats. These MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I exam questions formats are Salesforce MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I PDF dumps files, desktop practice test software, and web-based practice test software.

Salesforce MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic	Details
Topic 1	Architecting and Deploying API Implementations: It covers important aspects like using auto-discovery, identifying VPC requirements, comparing hosting options and understanding testing methods. The topic also involves automated building, testing, and deploying in a DevOps setting.
Topic 2	Monitoring and Analyzing Application Networks: It discusses Anypoint Platform components for data generation, collected metrics, and key alerts. This topic also includes specifying alerts to define Mule applications.
Topic 3	Explaining Application Network Basics: This topic includes sub-topics related to identifying and differentiating between technologies for API-led connectivity, describing the role and characteristics of web APIs, assigning APIs to tiers, and understanding Anypoint Platform components.
Topic 4	Designing APIs Using System, Process, and Experience Layers: Identifying suitable APIs for business processes, assigning them according to functional focus, and recommending data model approaches are its sub-topics.
Topic 5	Establishing Organizational and Platform Foundations: Advising on a Center for Enablement (C4E) and identifying KPIs, describing MuleSoft Catalyst's structure, comparing Identity and Client Management options, and identifying data residency types are essential sub-topics.
Topic 6	Governing Web APIs on Anypoint Platform: This topic includes sub-topics related to managing API instances and environments, selecting API policies, enforcing API policies, securing APIs, and understanding OAuth 2.0 relationships.
Topic 7	Deploying API Implementations to CloudHub: Understanding Object Store usage, selecting worker sizes, predicting app reliability and performance, and comparing load balancers. Avoiding single points of failure in deployments is also its sub-topic.
Topic 8	Meeting API Quality Goals: This topic focuses on designing resilience strategies, selecting appropriate caching and OS usage scenarios, and describing horizontal scaling benefits.

>> MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I Dumps Cost <<

Latest MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I Dumps Sheet & MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I Valid Study Materials

Many people would like to fall back on the most authoritative company no matter when they have any question about preparing for MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I exam. Our company is definitely one of the most authoritative companies in the international market for MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I exam. What's more, we will provide the most considerate after sale service for our customers in twenty four hours a day seven days a week, therefore, our company is really the best choice for you to buy the MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I Training Materials.

Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Platform Architect I Sample Questions (Q22-Q27):

NEW QUESTION # 22
A company has started to create an application network and is now planning to implement a Center for Enablement (C4E) organizational model. What key factor would lead the company to decide upon a federated rather than a centralized C4E?

A. When there are a large number of existing common assets shared by development teams
B. When the majority of the applications in the application network are cloud based
C. When various teams responsible for creating APIs are new to integration and hence need extensive training
D. When development is already organized into several independent initiatives or groups

Answer: D

NEW QUESTION # 23
A System API is designed to retrieve data from a backend system that has scalability challenges. What API policy can best safeguard the backend system?

A. Client ID enforcement
B. IPwhitelist
C. SLA-based rate limiting
D. Auth 2 token enforcement

Answer: C

Explanation:
Correct Answer : SLA-based rate limiting
*****************************************
>> Client Id enforement policy is a "Compliance" related NFR and does not help in maintaining the "Quality of Service (QoS)". It CANNOT and NOT meant for protecting the backend systems from scalability challenges.
>> IP Whitelisting and OAuth 2.0 token enforcement are "Security" related NFRs and again does not help in maintaining the "Quality of Service (QoS)". They CANNOT and are NOT meant for protecting the backend systems from scalability challenges.
Rate Limiting, Rate Limiting-SLA, Throttling, Spike Control are the policies that are "Quality of Service (QOS)" related NFRs and are meant to help in protecting the backend systems from getting overloaded.
https://dzone.com/articles/how-to-secure-apis

NEW QUESTION # 24
What API policy would be LEAST LIKELY used when designing an Experience API that is intended to work with a consumer mobile phone or tablet application?

A. Client ID enforcement
B. OAuth 2.0 access token enforcement
C. IPwhitellst
D. JSON threat protection

Answer: C

Explanation:
Correct Answer : IP whitelist
*****************************************
>> OAuth 2.0 access token and Client ID enforcement policies are VERY common to apply on Experience APIs as API consumers need to register and access the APIs using one of these mechanisms
>> JSON threat protection is also VERY common policy to apply on Experience APIs to prevent bad or suspicious payloads hitting the API implementations.
>> IP whitelisting policy is usually very common in Process and System APIs to only whitelist the IP range inside the local VPC. But also applied occassionally on some experience APIs where the End User/ API Consumers are FIXED.
>> When we know the API consumers upfront who are going to access certain Experience APIs, then we can request for static IPs from such consumers and whitelist them to prevent anyone else hitting the API.
However, the experience API given in the question/ scenario is intended to work with a consumer mobile phone or tablet application. Which means, there is no way we can know all possible IPs that are to be whitelisted as mobile phones and tablets can so many in number and any device in the city/state/country/globe.
So, It is very LEAST LIKELY to apply IP Whitelisting on such Experience APIs whose consumers are typically Mobile Phones or Tablets.

NEW QUESTION # 25
The asset version 2.0.0 of the Order API is successfully published in Exchange and configured in API Manager with the Autodiscovery API ID correctly linked to the API implementation, A new GET method is added to the existing API specification, and after updates, the asset version of the Order API is 2.0.1, What happens to the Autodiscovery API ID when the new asset version is updated in API Manager?

A. The APLID does not change, so no changes to the APT implementation are needed for the new asset version in the API Autodiscovery global element
B. The APL ID does not change, but the API implementation must be updated in the AP] Autodiscovery global element to indicate the new asset version 2.0.4
C. The APL ID changes, so the API implementation must be updated with the latest API ID for the new asset version in the API Autodiscovery global element
D. The API ID changes, but no changes are needed to the API implementation for the new asset version in the API Autediscovery global element because the API ID is automatically updated

Answer: A

Explanation:
Understanding API Autodiscovery in MuleSoft:
API Autodiscovery links an API implementation in Anypoint Platform with its configuration in API Manager. This is controlled by the API ID which is set in the API Autodiscovery element in the Mule application.
The API ID remains consistent across minor updates to the API asset version in Exchange (e.g., from 2.0.0 to 2.0.1) as long as it is the same API.
Effect of Asset Version Update on API Autodiscovery:
When the asset version is updated (e.g., from 2.0.0 to 2.0.1), the API ID remains the same. Therefore, no changes are needed in the Autodiscovery configuration within the Mule application. The Autodiscovery will continue to link the API implementation to the latest version in API Manager.
Evaluating the Options:
Option A: Incorrect, as the API ID does not automatically change with minor asset version updates.
Option B: Incorrect, as the API ID remains the same, so no update is needed in the API implementation.
Option C (Correct Answer): The API ID does not change, so no changes are necessary in the API implementation for the new asset version.
Option D: Incorrect, as there is no need to update the API implementation in the Autodiscovery global element for minor version changes.
Conclusion:
Option C is the correct answer, as the API ID remains unchanged with minor version updates, and no changes are needed in the API Autodiscovery configuration.
Refer to MuleSoft documentation on API Autodiscovery and version management for more details.

NEW QUESTION # 26
A company stores financial transaction data in two legacy systems. For each legacy system, a separate, dedicated System API (SAPI) exposes data for that legacy system. A Process API (PAPI) merges the data retrieved from ail of the System APIs into a common format. Several API clients call the PAPI through its public domain name.
The company now wants to expose a subset of financial data to a newly developed mobile application that uses a different Bounded Context Data Model. The company wants to follow MuleSoft's best practices for building out an effective application network.
Following MuleSoft's best practices, how can the company expose financial data needed by the mobile application in a way that minimizes the impact on the currently running API clients, API implementations, and support asset reuse?

A. Create a new mobile Experince API (EAPI) chat exposes that subset of PAPI endpoints.
Add transformtion login to the mobile Experince API implementation to make mobile data compatible with the required PAPIs.
B. Develop and deploy is new PAPI implementation with data transformation and ... login to support this required endpoints of both mobile and web clients.
Deploy an API Proxy with an endpoint from API Manager that redirect the existing PAPI endpoints to the new PAPI.
C. Add two new Experience APIs (EAPI-i and EAPI-2}.
Add Mobile PAPI-2 to expose the Intended subset of financial data as requested.
Both PAPIs access the Legacy Systems via SAPI-1 and SAP]-2.
D. Add two new Experience APIs (EAPI-i and EAPI-2}.
Add Mobile PAPI-2 to expose the Intended subset of financial data as requested.
Both PAPIs access the Legacy Systems via SAPI-1 and SAP]-2.

Answer: D

Explanation:
To achieve the goal of exposing financial data to a new mobile application while following MuleSoft's best practices, the company should follow an API-led connectivity approach. This approach ensures minimal disruption to existing clients, maximizes reusability, and respects the separation of concerns across API layers.
of Solution:
Experience APIs for Client-Specific Requirements:
Create two new Experience APIs (EAPI-1 and EAPI-2) for the mobile application, tailored to meet the specific data and format requirements of the mobile application. These APIs encapsulate the client-specific needs and provide a custom interface without impacting other clients.
Process API Layer for Data Transformation:
By adding Mobile PAPI-2, we allow the mobile application to access the required subset of data, formatted according to the mobile application's requirements. This approach ensures that data transformation and aggregation are handled in the Process layer, maintaining consistency and reusability across different applications.
Reuse of System APIs:
Both the new Mobile PAPI-2 and existing PAPI-1 access data from System APIs (SAPI-1 and SAPI-2), which continue to expose data from each legacy system in a consistent, reusable manner. This avoids duplicating logic and ensures that data access remains centralized and manageable.
Why Option A is Correct:
Option A aligns with MuleSoft's best practices by isolating client-specific requirements in the Experience layer, utilizing Process APIs for data orchestration and transformation, and maintaining reusable System APIs for backend access.
This approach also ensures that the current API clients are not impacted, as new clients (e.g., the mobile app) interact with newly defined Experience APIs without modifying the existing API setup.
of Incorrect Options:
Option B: This option seems similar but lacks clarity on the separation of mobile-specific requirements and does not explicitly mention data transformation, which is essential in this scenario.
Option C: Creating a single mobile Experience API that exposes a subset of PAPI endpoints directly adds unnecessary complexity and may violate the separation of concerns, as transformation logic should not be in the Experience layer.
Option D: Deploying a new PAPI and using an API Proxy to redirect existing endpoints would add unnecessary complexity, disrupt the current API clients, and increase maintenance efforts.
Reference
For additional guidance, refer to MuleSoft documentation on API-led connectivity best practices and best practices for structuring Experience, Process, and System APIs.

NEW QUESTION # 27
......

Some practice materials keep droning on the useless points of knowledge. In contrast, being venerated for high quality and accuracy rate, our MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I training quiz received high reputation for their efficiency and accuracy rate originating from your interests, and the whole review process may cushier than you have imagined before. Numerous of our loyal customers wrote to us to praise that the MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I Exam Questions are the same with the real exam questions and they passed MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I exam with ease.

Latest MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I Dumps Sheet: https://www.prep4surereview.com/MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I-latest-braindumps.html

P.S. Free & New MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I dumps are available on Google Drive shared by Prep4SureReview: https://drive.google.com/open?id=16cJQh7ozsgiKUngaCBLvLksf-IVmT_Jh

Report this page

ACTUAL MULESOFT-PLATFORM-ARCHITECT-I EXAM PREP MATERIALS IS THE BEST CHOICE FOR YOU

Actual MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I Exam Prep Materials is The Best Choice for You